General and experimental psychology
print


Breadcrumb Navigation


Content

Publications

Peer-reviewed articles

2015

13. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Taylor, P. C. J. (2015). Occipital TMS at phosphene detection threshold captures attention automatically. NeuroImage, 109, 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.035 [PDF]

2014

12. Rangelov, D., & Zeki, S. (2014). Non-binding relationship between visual features. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:749. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00749 [PDF]

11. Zinchenko, A., Kim, H., Danek, A., Müller, H.J., & Rangelov, D. (2014). Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli, Psychological Research, 1 – 12, doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0548-6 [PDF]

2013

10. Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Müller, H.J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). What are task-sets: A single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations?, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00524 [PDF]

9. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2013). Visual search for feature singletons: Multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(3):22, 1–16, doi:10.1167/13.3.22. [PDF]

2012

8. Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206382109 [PDF]

7. Zehetleitner, M., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. (2012). Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 879–890. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0287-y [PDF]

2011

6. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0251-2 [PDF]

5. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Independent dimension-weighting mechanisms for visual selection and stimulus identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1369-1382. doi:10.1037/a0024265 [PDF]

4. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 100-114. doi:10.1037/a0020364 [PDF]

2010

3. Müller, H. J., Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Geyer, T., Rangelov, D., & Krummenacher, J. (2010). Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing - A reply to Theeuwes (2010). Acta Psychologica. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.004 [PDF]

2004

2. Rangelov, D. (2004). Types of geometrical transformations and perceptual similarity of figures. Psihologija, 37(4), 483–493. doi:10.2298/PSI0404483R

2002

1. Todorović, J. A., & Rangelov, D. (2002). Connection between self-concept and school success. Godišnjak studijske grupe za psihologiju, (1), 115–122.

Conference talks and posters

Invited talks

7. “Feature-based attention matters most when the space-based attention fails”. Institut für Psychologie, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Germany, December, 2014

6. “Feature-based attention matters most when the space-based attention fails”. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, July, 2014

5. “Feature-based attention matters most when the space-based attention fails”. Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, July, 2014

4. "Object binding as a post-perceptual process". Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, March, 2013

3. “Task-switch costs are task specific: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence”, International Cognitive-Neuroscience Meeting, Marmaris, Turkey, May 2011

2. "Sequence effects in simple cognitive tasks: The Muliple-Weighting-Systems hypothesis", Department of Psychology, General and Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland, February 2011

1. "Decomposition of dimension-specific intertrial effects: separate weighting systems modulate visual selection and identification processes", Donders Institute, Radbound University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, December 2009

Oral presentation

7. "Occipital TMS at phosphene threshold captures attention". 37th European Conference on Visual Perception, Belgrade, Serbia, August 2014

6. "Are faces special? An EEG investigation of early processes of face perception", Empirical Investigations in Psychology, Belgrade, Serbia, March 2013

5. "Pop-out visual search mechanisms: Not all set-sizes are created equal", Empirical Investigations in Psychology, Belgrade, Serbia, February 2012

4. “Fractionating task-switch costs: A multi-component model of task switching”, XXIX European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology, Bressanone, Italy, January 2011

3. “How the task requirements influence spatial selection processes?”, Empirical Investigations in Psychology, Belgrade, Serbia, February 2009

2. “Weighting mechanisms in information processing”, Balkan Vision Science Meeting, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 2008

1. “Task-specificity of weighting dynamics: One or two dimension-weighting systems?”, Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Marburg, Deutschland, March 2008

Poster presentation

11. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Töllner, T. (2014). "Efficiency of attentional selection is continuous rather than categorical", XII International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Brisbane, Australia

10. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2012). "Pop-out visual search mechanisms: Not all displays densities are made equal", III Visual search and selective attention symposium, Munich, Germany

9. Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H.J. (2012). Detecting, localizing, and identifying feature singletons in visual search: How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence. III Visual search and selective attention symposium, Munich, Germany

8. Rangelov, D., Töllner, T., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Fractionating task-switch costs: A multi-component model of task switching, XI International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Palma, Spain

7. Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H.J. (2011). Detecting, localizing, and identifying feature singletons in visual search: Does task set influence the speed of pre-attentive processing?, Vision Sciences Society Meeting, Naples, Florida, USA

6. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2009). Multiple dimension-weighting systems: A single versus multiple processing streams?, Rovereto Attention Workshop, Rovereto, Italy

5. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2009). Decomposition of dimension-specific intertrial effects: Separate weighting systems modulate selection and identification processes, European Conference on Visual Perception, Regensburg, Germany

4. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2008). Dimension-specific intertrial effects are task-specific: Evidence for multiple weighting mechanisms, Munich Visual Search Symposium, Fribourg, Switzerland

3. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2008). Dimension-repetition benefit across trials is task-specific, International Conference on Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2. Rangelov, D., Müller, H., & Zehetleitner, M. (2007). Task-change modulation of dimension-specific intertrial priming effects, Rovereto Attention Workshop, Rovereto, Italy

1. Rangelov, D., & Markovic, S. (2004). Perceptual sensitivity to different spatial transformations of shape, European Conference on Visual Perception, Budapest, Hungary

Book contributions

1. Wykowska, A., & Rangelov, D. (2010) Review of: Brian Bruya (Ed.) Effortless Attention. A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Journal of Consciousness Studies.

Published thesis

1. Rangelov, D. (2010). Sequence effects in simple cognitive tasks: the multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Diss., 2010. Retrieved from http://d-nb.info/1015925251/