General and experimental psychology
print


Breadcrumb Navigation


Content

2018

Al-Amin, M., Zinchenko, A., & Geyer, T. (2018). Hippocampal subfield volume changes in subtypes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain Research, 1685, 1-8.

Allenmark, F., Müller, H. J., & Shi, Z. (2018). Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(7): e1006328.

Assumpção, L., Shi, Z., Zang, X., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2018). Contextual cueing of tactile search is coded in an anatomical reference frame. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 566-577.

Bucher, L., Bublak, P., Kerkhoff, G., Geyer, T., Müller, H. J., & Finke, K. (2018). Spatial remapping in visual search: Remapping cues are provided at attended and ignored locations. Acta Psychologica, 190, 103-115.

Chen, S., Glasauer, S., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2018). Surface filling-in and contour interpolation contribute independently to Kanizsa figure formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 1399–1413.

Chen, S., Schnabl, L., Müller, H. J., & Conci. M. (2018). Amodal completion of a target template enhances attentional guidance in visual search. i-Perception, 9(4), 1–10.

Chen, S., Töllner, T., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2018). Object maintenance beyond their visible parts in working memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 119, 347–355.

Conci, M., Groß, J., Keller, I., Müller, H. J., & Finke, K. (2018). Attention as the 'glue' for object integration in parietal extinction. Cortex, 101, 60-72.

Greimel, E., Bakos, S., Landes, I., Töllner, T., Bartling, J., Kohls, G., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2018). Sex differences in the neural underpinnings of social and monetary incentive processing during adolescence. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 296-312.

Geyer, T., Günther, F., Kacian, J., Müller, H. J., & Pierides, S. (2018). Reading haiku: What eye movements reveal about the construction of literary meaning – an exploratory study. In T. Lachmann & T. Weis (Eds.). New Stages in Human Information Processing Research: In Search of Invariants in Cognition. New York: Taylor & Francis (pp. 249-276).

Hanning, N. M., & Deubel, H. (2018). Independent effects of eye and hand movements on visual working memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 12: 32.

Hanning, N. M., Aagten-Murphy, D., & Deubel, H. (2018). Independent selection of eye and hand targets suggests effector-specific attentional mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 9434.

Haupt, M., Sorg, C., Napiórkowski, N., & Finke, K. (2018). Phasic alertness cues modulate visual processing speed in healthy aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 70, 30-39.

Kaiser, J., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2018). Sensory attenuation of self-produced signals does not rely on self-specific motor predictions. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47, 1303-1310.

Künstler, E. C. S., Penning, M. D., Napiórkowski, N., Klingner, C. M., Witte, O. W., Müller, H. J., Bublak, P., & Finke, K. (2018). Dual task effects on visual attention capacity in normal aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 1564.

Liu, Y., Zang, X., Chen, L., Assumpção, L., & Li, H. (2018). Vicariously touching products through observing others' hand actions increases purchasing intention, and the effect of visual perspective in this process: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 332-343.

Marshall, A. C., Gentsch, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2018). The Interaction between Interoceptive and Action States within a Framework of Predictive Coding. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 180.

Marshall, A. C., Gentsch, A., Schröder, L., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2018). Cardiac interoceptive learning is modulated by emotional valence perceived from facial expressions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13, 677-686.

Nie, Q.-Y., Ding, X., Chen, J., & Conci, M. (2018). Social attention directs working memory maintenance. Cognition, 171, 85-94.

Ruiz-Rizzo, A. L., Neitzel, J., Müller, H. J., Sorg, C., & Finke, K. (2018). Distinctive correspondence between separable visual attention functions and intrinsic brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12: 89.

Sauter, M., Liesefeld, H. R., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2018). Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same-but not different-dimension distractors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 622-642.

Schlagbauer, B., Rausch, M., Zehetleitner, M., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2018). Contextual cueing of visual search is associated with greater subjective experience of the search display configuration. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, niy001.

Ticini, L. F., Dolk, T., Waszak, F., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2018). IPL-M1 interaction shapes pre-reflective social differentiation in the human action system: new insights from TBS and TMS combined. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 12001.

Wiegand, I., Napiorkowski, N., Töllner, T., Petersen, A., Habekostm T., Müller, H. J., & Finke, K. (2018). Event-related electroencephalographic lateralizations mark individual differences in spatial and nonspatial visual selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 482-497.

Wollenberg, L., Deubel, H., & Szinte, M. (2018). Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades. PLoS Biology, 16(6): e2006548.

Zang, X., Zinchenko, A., Jia, L., Assumpção, L., & Li H. (2018). Global repetition influences contextual cueing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 402.

Zinchenko, A., Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2018). Predictive visual search: role of environmental regularities in the learning of context cues. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 1096–1109.