Links and Functions

Breadcrumb Navigation


Jan-Willem Strijbos: Peer assessment in learning contexts

Basic reading

  • Strijbos, J. W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H.(2009). Fostering interactivity through formative peer assessment in (web-based) collaborative learning environments. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 375-395). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment through (quasi) experimental research. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265-269. [Special issue intro] [Open access]

Additional reading on "Peer assessment"

  • Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peerassessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 891-901.
  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A metaanalysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
  • Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 137-155.
  • Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348.
  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444.
  • Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environments Research, 1, 293-319.
  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
  • Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4, 41-54.
  • Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.

Additional reading on “Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning”

  • Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 806-814.
  • Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers and Education, 40, 377-391.
  • Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration process. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63-86.
  • Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151-161.
  • Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEETransactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59-73.


Webinar as audio file (.mp3)